News
[05/14]
New York Mortgage Trust Announces Correction to its Previously Issued First Quarter 2008 Earnings Release
[05/14]
Grayson Place Named 'Denver Top Property' by Colorado Homes & Lifestyle Magazine
[05/14]
Macy's reports loss on weak sales, restructuring
More...
Articles
Choosing a Successful Location for Your Business
Because there's no universal rule for choosing a good business location, it's important for every business owner to figure out how location will (or won't) contribute to the success of the business -- and to choose a spot accordingly. While there are many issues to consider when you're looking for space to house your business, make sure you ask yourself these four important questions:
More...
Do I need a written lease or rental agreement?
The lease or rental agreement is the key document of the tenancy, setting out important issues such as:
More...
|
|
Case Summaries
[05/14]
Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures, L.C. In an action brought by plaintiff-architect under the Copyright Act alleging that defendants infringed his copyrighted architectural designs via the design, development, and construction of certain Trump buildings, summary judgment for defendants, as well as a denial of a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint, are affirmed where a thorough review of the record indicated that the district court properly made its rulings under the specific facts of the case and did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for leave to amend.
[05/13]
Garcia v. Brockway An aggrieved person must bring a private civil action under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) for a failure to properly design and construct within two years of the completion of the construction phase, which concludes on the date that the last certificate of occupancy is issued. (Panel opinion adopted by the en banc court with amendments)
[05/13]
N. Pacifica LLC v. City of Pacifica In an action brought by a developer against the city of Pacifica involving a proposed condominium project, dismissal of developer's substantive due process claim is affirmed, but an order holding city liable for an equal protection violation is reversed and the resultant damages awards vacated where: 1) the developer was not entitled to judgment on an equal protection claim, as the city did not intentionally treat it differently from any other developer; and 2) a due process claim should not be resurrected because developer did not allege any irrational delay in the city's approval of its permits.
More...
|